DICTY Archives

February 2010, Week 1

DICTY@LISTSERV.IT.NORTHWESTERN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Gomer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:52:53 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hi Daniel-
I would say that they're genetically equal, but physiologically quite  
different due to the cell-cycle dependent and sister cell differences  
in Ca++, cytosolic pH, and levels of proteins such as RtoA.
cheers
Richard Gomer


Quoting Daniel Lusche <[log in to unmask]>:

> Dear all,
> can anyone provide me with a reference for a review or an update on  
> the state of the art whether all cells of a clone (such as a  
> labstrain) are considered to be equal early on in development or  
> whether  the qualitative differences reported by some earlier  
> studies confirm that they are not equal. Any news about what seems  
> to be the case?
> Cheers
> Dan
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2