DICTY Archives

January 2013, Week 5

DICTY@LISTSERV.IT.NORTHWESTERN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SM plates
From:
Richard Sucgang PhD <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DICTY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:41:09 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines) 
The issue is primarily one of reproducibility. The feeder bacteria can probably grow in the new medium using bacto peptone, but you won't have the privilege of all prior optimizations using standard SM. Experiments will have to be reoptimized from that point on. 

On Jan 31, 2013, at 10:04 AM, "John B. Biggins" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dicty newbie here:  
> 
> Anyone see any difference in using bacto peptone instead of proteose peptone in SM plates?
> 
> Thanks

ATOM RSS1 RSS2